Left or Right ,Which ideology is the only priority

 Left ideology is the only priority

Udta Punjab film has raised many questions. Since the appointment of Nihalani as the president of the central Film censor Board, some political parties are embarrassing to those committed to some political ideals. From the beginning of our cinemas, the ideological ideology is preferred. They also led the government in their own way. Now they do not like some actions taken by the NDA government. When he was appointed as the President of Pune's Film Institute, he stirred up without taking power. Courses have become anxious when changing the lessons. That's it. For instance, the release of Viswanath Shankarabharanam, the National Award for the National Award given to the National Award for the National Award, which gave it a name and gave them a name. Similarly, the Narendra Modi government should now think about how a person should be put on the scene. Udta was found in Punjab.

Not all members of the central Film Censor board are aware of it. The NDA government has not appointed all those members. For instance, the NDA government has appointed about 50 people as regional censor board members in Hyderabad. Earlier, 50 members were appointed by the UPA government. How many of these people can recognize the creative power and cultural values? How many porn sites can be identified? What is the nature of pornography? What is harming the community?

The Left Party, Udta punjab, has been emphasizing on the same issue as those who oppose the decisions taken by the censor board. Film Censor is embracing the freedom of expression, and their argument is wrong. KT Abbas has said that it will come under Article 19 (2) to censor the Supreme Court in the case of his Union of India (AIR 1971 SC 481) that there is no mistake. Whatever can be censored when doing so, what cannot be done depends on country conditions. Cultural values in one country may be difficult in another country. Period values can vary in the same country. The Supreme Court ruled that the decision of the Indian Cultural Court should be drawn up in the case of Ranjit State of Maharashtra (AIR 1965 SC 891).

The judgment of the Bombay High Court in Udhta Punjab cinema is somewhat irrelevant. The Central Censor Board defines the way it has acted. But the censor is not at the original. Film producers also said that it should be fulfilled. Another suit was filed in Punjab Haryana High Court. You have to wait until there is no judgment.

Whatever it was, Udta created the chaos in the film producers. The High Court has agreed that the film is working on the scene.

now 

the members of Sri Rajput Karunanidhi are objecting to the way Alauddin Khilji created in the film.