Chit mai jeeta, pat tu hara isko ulta kar chalo pat tu hara chit mai jeeta
The out look of the editor of "Outlook" magazine
But in a country croaking under a backlog of more than three crore cases—including about 59,000 cases in the Supreme Court—one wonders why the previous Chief Justice, Ranjan Gogoi, decided to focus on Ayodhya alone, holding expeditious hearings for days as if nothing else mattered to clear the decks for its judgment just days before his retirement.
If the Allahabad High Court sets aside your election you impose emergency on the country that is good.
But when you wait from 1858 and if the CJI decides it is safe to take up the case before his retirement ,You are unhappy .What goes Mr.Ruben Banerjee
The first recorded legal history in Ayodhya dispute dates back to 1858
the 2019 election is widely seen as affirmation that the Indian electorate votes for, and expects, a presidential-style government — with sovereignty residing in a directly elected leader rather than the leader of a parliamentary party. Framed this way, it is not surprising that the Opposition failed in putting up a decent fight — with neither a united ideology nor a leader with similar popular charisma, the presidential duel was lost because only one side was in it.
Continue reading at https://vidhilegalpolicy.in/2019/06/20/a-presidential-system-masquerading-as-a-parliamentary-democracy-the-telegraph/ | Vidhi Centre for Legal Polic
Disruption rather than debate has become the default in Parliament
people in their early twenties are becoming judicial magistrates and deciding our fate, with many of them soliciting advice—for want of experience—through WhatsApp to decide cases.
I think this may be a good indicator of the participation of general public isn't it so?
The out look of the editor of "Outlook" magazine
But in a country croaking under a backlog of more than three crore cases—including about 59,000 cases in the Supreme Court—one wonders why the previous Chief Justice, Ranjan Gogoi, decided to focus on Ayodhya alone, holding expeditious hearings for days as if nothing else mattered to clear the decks for its judgment just days before his retirement.
If the Allahabad High Court sets aside your election you impose emergency on the country that is good.
But when you wait from 1858 and if the CJI decides it is safe to take up the case before his retirement ,You are unhappy .What goes Mr.Ruben Banerjee
The first recorded legal history in Ayodhya dispute dates back to 1858
the 2019 election is widely seen as affirmation that the Indian electorate votes for, and expects, a presidential-style government — with sovereignty residing in a directly elected leader rather than the leader of a parliamentary party. Framed this way, it is not surprising that the Opposition failed in putting up a decent fight — with neither a united ideology nor a leader with similar popular charisma, the presidential duel was lost because only one side was in it.
Continue reading at https://vidhilegalpolicy.in/2019/06/20/a-presidential-system-masquerading-as-a-parliamentary-democracy-the-telegraph/ | Vidhi Centre for Legal Polic
Disruption rather than debate has become the default in Parliament
people in their early twenties are becoming judicial magistrates and deciding our fate, with many of them soliciting advice—for want of experience—through WhatsApp to decide cases.
I think this may be a good indicator of the participation of general public isn't it so?
No comments:
Post a Comment