Tuesday, May 29, 2018

The discussion of “could we do it” became one of “should we do it”

 "the view of the body as an entity of replacement parts. Who would not want a life-saving, off-the-shelf device fix for a loved one dying of heart failure? Medical and public debate evolved from the desirability of artificial hearts to the feasibility and sustainability of such expensive end-stage disease therapies. The discussion of “could we do it” became one of “should we do it” as a greater number of stakeholders, including medical practitioners, politicians, bioethicists, patients, and the public, weighed in after often-sensational clinical cases."

No comments: