Saturday, November 19, 2016

I beg to differ with a number of liberal TV pundits about Michael Flynn


I do not know whether president elect Donald Trump's (PREZ T) to make Michael Flynn the national security adviser is a good decision or not.

Only time will tell whether Michael Flynn can succeed in rooting out ISIS are not.

Where I differ from the other liberal TV pundits is to paint Michael Flynn as some flaky person who calls the religion of Islam as the main root cause of all terrorism. One need to understand that all those people who talk about Islam being a religion of peace do not know their history or what is written in their holy Koran.

"The second inescapable truth asserts that merely killing insurgents usually serves to multiply enemies rather than subtract them. This counterintuitive dynamic is common in many guerrilla conflicts and is especially relevant in the revenge-prone Pashtun communities whose cooperation military forces seek to earn and maintain. The Soviets experienced this reality in the 1980s, when despite killing hundreds of thousands of Afghans, they faced a larger insurgency near the end of the war than they did at the beginning"

The above paragraph goes totally against the Obama doctrine of drone warfare.

Which I totally agree with. PREZ T may look like an idiot but not everybody who is around him are idiots except for Bannon of course!

 this paragraph  by  Flynn is  uncanny

To understand the dynamics of this process, it is useful to think of the Afghanistan war as a political campaign, albeit a violent one. If an election campaign spent all of its effort attacking the opposition and none figuring out which districts were undecided, which were most worthy of competing for, and what specific messages were necessary to sway them, the campaign would be destined to fail. No serious contender for the American presidency ever confined himself or herself solely to the “strategic” level of a campaign, telling the staff to worry only about the national and regional picture and to leave individual counties and election districts entirely in the hands of local party organizers, disconnected from the overall direction of the campaign. I

No comments: