Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics
https://books.google.com › books
1913 Farming The terms “technology” and “mechanization” bring to mind images of great auto assembly plants or oil refineries or an army of robots doing man's work
cally or more accurately by automated equipment will restruc• tured; many Of them will upgraded or disappear. However. until reccntly. relatively few Precision xssernbly jobs have eliminated by automation. The need for precision, independent judgment. and knowledge has placed many jobs tryond the capabilities of robots. Because much precision assernbly work is done in difficult-to-reach l«ations unsuited for robots—inside airplane fuselages or inside gear boxes. for example—replacement of these workers by automated pro- cesses will be slower and less comprehensive than replacement Of welders and painters.
1913
Farming The terms “technology” and “mechanization” bring to mind images of great auto assembly plants or oil refineries or an army of robots doing man's work
Page count:336
Published:1995
Publisher:U.S. Department of Agriculture
Original from:the University of California
Digitized:April 21, 2016
Contributor:United States. Department of Agriculture
Estimated Househow
Penetration
Product
of y..r.End 1984)
All Television
Color TV
Monochrome TV
Projection TV
VCR
Programmable Video Garnes
Home Computers
Audio Systems
• Compact
• Component
Console
Telephone Answering Devices
Cordless Telephones
Home Radios
98%
91%
2%
1%
25%
13%
87%
51%
38%
23%
5%
10%
98%
UTAH/MIT hand With four fingers (4 degrees of freedom in each finger)
HARVARD two-finger manipulator
SANDLA National Laboratories hand With three fingers
STANFORD autonomms platform
HERMLES autonomous moving
USC hand With two finge.rs
OHIO robot leg
NOMAD moving robot With Six legs
LEHIGH arm (seven Dgrees of freedom)
TURTLE—l moving With four legs
DARM—2 arm (seven degees of freedom)
Sugarman (72al predicß that tlr near future of tyr intelligent robots are not too auspicious, due to their high üXt, small numbers available, and their insufficient application space. Ferreira [72bl gives a different picture In predicts that intelligent rot»ts Can replace human workers in the industrial environment, resulting in increased productivity and improved product quality while reducing production costS. His major premise that work for an extensive, performing at efficiency. Figure 1 shows future predictions for the robots market and their available number in the near future [72]. An additional factor in support of Ferreira 's is that the mcst healthy industrial coqx'rations have already their own robots the market comy*tition is t*ginning rotx»tic projects. Moreover, Bhanu 1331 asserts that sales of industrial roboß reached SOS billion in 1986, are to reach SS.8 billion by 1995. A summari&d sales forecast by the of Manuåcturing Engineers Delphi (Ta-
Forecasted Robot Characteristic
vc'pm
1990 Sales of Robots having the
Forecasted Characteristics (%)
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Robots cornE»sed Of modular standard cornrX)nentS
Use Of general purpcse hand
robots
ReFtability less than or equal to 0,001 inch
Use of integral Sensors
Use of pattern recognition and
Use Of vision
Robots that can be programmed
63
20
15
93
60
22
25
20
Source: From Ref- 57.
ble 1) supports this extrapolation. It is estimated that more than half of the increase in U.S.
productivity (defined as the Output ofthe goods or services produced unit of labor input)
results from technological improvernents, combined With improved management
and employee training [571. Recently, Schenker [541 has propcsed new research goals of
NASA in telerobos (Table 2).
Forecasted Robot Characteristic
vc'pm
1990 Sales of Robots having the
Forecasted Characteristics (%)
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Robots cornE»sed Of modular standard cornrX)nentS
Use Of general purpcse hand
robots
ReFtability less than or equal to 0,001 inch
Use of integral Sensors
Use of pattern recognition and
Use Of vision
Robots that can be programmed
63
20
15
93
60
22
25
20
Source: From Ref- 57.
ble 1) supports this extrapolation. It is estimated that more than half of the increase in U.S.
productivity (defined as the Output ofthe goods or services produced unit of labor input)
results from technological improvernents, combined With improved management
and employee training [571. Recently, Schenker [541 has propcsed new research goals of
NASA in telerobos (Table 2).
fiction writers such as Isaac Asimov.44 Perhaps the most fundamental question of all is, Do we really need to replace humans by intelligent machines? Do the demands for productivity require that smart computers of some description replace thousands of workers? Should we, say, re- place typists With scanning machines that recognize different handwrit- ing? The counterargument may be best represented by an anecdote. A union leader looking over a quarry Site bemoans the fate of his workers. He approaches the quarry owner and says, "lf it wasn't for those steam shovels, we'd be employing 500 men With shovels." The owner replies, "And if it wasn't for your 500 men With shovels, we'd be employing 10,000 men With thimbles." Perhaps the message of this anecdote is not just that technological change demands changes in the nature of work, but that work can also be dangerous, dirty, and degrading to human beings. In that case, perhaps the design of work for human beings in conjunction With intelligent technology is What we require. Beyond that, the job-reducing potential of technology needs to be managed more effectively by the provision of training programs, incentive schemes, and appropriate government policies.
No comments:
Post a Comment