Tuesday, October 16, 2018

FULL TEXT ARTICLE

Trichoscopy  RSS  Download PDF

Dermatologic Clinics, 2013-01-01, Volume 31, Issue 1, Pages 29-41, Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc.
Trichoscopy (or dermoscopy of hair and scalp) is an easy in-office technique that may be performed with a handheld dermoscope or a digital videodermoscopy system. This method is gaining increasing popularity, because it may be applied in differential diagnosis of multiple hair and scalp diseases. The focus of this article is application of trichoscopy in differential diagnosis of the most frequent hair and scalp diseases in dermatologic practice. Trichoscopy of genetic hair shaft abnormalities are briefly addressed. A new classification of perifollicular and interfollicular skin surface abnormalities is proposed.

Key Points

  •  
    Trichoscopy (hair and scalp dermoscopy) may be performed with any handheld or digital dermoscope.
  •  
    This method may be used as a diagnostic aid in differential diagnosis of hair loss and scalp diseases and in monitoring therapy.
  •  
    Trichoscopy diagnosis is based on evaluation of hair shafts, follicular openings, and perifollicular epidermis.
  •  
    Characteristic trichoscopy features of several hair and scalp diseases are known. These diseases include alopecia areata, androgenetic alopecia, discoid lupus erythematosus, folliculitis decalvans, genetic hair shaft abnormalities, lichen planopilaris, scalp psoriasis, tinea capitis, and trichotillomania.
Trichoscopy (or dermoscopy of hair and scalp) is an easy in-office technique that may be performed with a handheld dermoscope or a digital videodermoscopy system. This method is gaining increasing popularity, because it may be widely applied in differential diagnosis of hair and scalp diseases.
Trichoscopy is based on analysis of structures that may be visualized with a dermoscope. These basic structures may be divided into 4 groups: (1) hair shafts, (2) hair follicle openings (dots), (3) perifollicular epidermis, and (4) blood vessels.

Basic structures

Evaluation of Hair Shafts

The authors have recently suggested a classification of hair shaft abnormalities that may be visualized by trichoscopy.  This classification distinguishes the following groups of hair shaft abnormalities: (1) hair shafts with fractures, (2) hair narrowings, (3) hairs with node-like structures, (4) curls and twists, (5) bands, and (4) short hairs. Only selected types of abnormalities are discussed in this article.
Many types of short hairs appear crucial for differential diagnosis of the most frequent types of hair loss in clinical practice. These are hairs that are less than 5 mm long. They include, among others, bent and hypopigmented vellus hairs, which are most characteristic of androgenetic alopecia.  Vellus hairs may be also present in long-lasting, severe alopecia areata.  Another type of short hairs is comma  and corckscrew hairs, which are characteristic for tinea capitis. Short flame-like hairs are observed in trichotillomania. 
Micro–exclamation mark hairs are hairs with narrowings at the proximal end. This type of abnormality is observed in alopecia areata and in trichotillomania. 

Evaluation of Hair Follicle Openings (Dots)

With trichoscopy, whether hair follicle openings are normal, empty, fibrotic, or contain biologic material, such as hyperkeratotic plugs or hair residues, may be distinguished. Dots is a common term for hair follicle openings seen by trichoscopy. 
Black dots (formerly called cadaverized hairs) represent pigmented hairs broken or destroyed at scalp level. They are observed in alopecia areata, dissecting cellulitis, tinea capitis, and trichotillomania. 
Yellow dots are hair follicle openings that contain keratosebaceous material.  They may be observed in alopecia areata,  discoid lupus ertythematosus,  and female androgenic alopecia.  Rarely, yellow dots may be observed in telogen effluvium and trichotillomania.  Yellow dots, appearing as large 3-D soap bubbles imposed over dark dystrophic hairs, are specific for dissecting cellulitis. 
There are 2 types of white dots: classic, big, irregular white dots and pinpoint white dots. Classic white dots represent areas of perifollicular fibrosis and are observed most commonly in lichen planopilaris.  Pinpoint white dots correspond to hair follicle openings and eccrine gland openings, observed within pigmented background. They are present in patients with dark skin phototypes, regardless of hair loss. 
Red dots are described in discoid lupus erythematosus and are considered a good prognostic finding, indicating possible hair regrowth. 
Regularly distributed gray or brown-gray dots are a characteristic finding in the eyebrow area of patients with frontal fibrosing alopecia. 

Evaluation of Perifollicular Epidermis

Abnormalities of scalp skin color or structure that may be visualized by trichoscopy include scaling, changes in color, abnormalities in skin surface structure, and presence of discharge. A new classification of these abnormalities is presented in Box 1 , which indicates the clinical significance of individual abnormalities. 
BOX 1
  •  
    Scaling
    •  
      Diffuse
      •  
        White (psoriasis, discoid lupus erythematosus, allergic dermatitis, dry skin)
      •  
        Yellowish (seborrheic dermatitis, discoid lupus erythematosus, ichthyosis)
    •  
      Perifollicular
      •  
        Color of scales
        •  
          White (lichen planopilaris)
        •  
          Yellowish (folliculitis decalvans)
      •  
        Shape of scale arrangement
        •  
          Tubular (lichen planopilaris)
        •  
          Tubular with collar formation (folliculitis decalvans)
  •  
    Color
    •  
      Brown areas
      •  
        Honeycomb hyperpigmentation (common)
      •  
        Perifollicular; peripilar sign (female and male androgenetic alopecia, telogen effluvium, healthy individuals)
      •  
        Scattered (discoid lupus erythematosus, actinic keratosis)
    •  
      White areas (cicatricial alopecia, detached epidermis, edema)
    •  
      Pink, strawberry ice cream–color areas (early fibrosis in cicatricial alopecia)
    •  
      Yellow areas (dissecting cellulitis, follicular pustules, bacterial infection)
    •  
      Red (inflammation, extravasation, erosion, vascular abnormalities)
    •  
      Violaceous blue (lichen planopilaris, discoid lupus erythematosus)
  •  
    Discharge
    •  
      Yellow and yellow-red (folliculitis decalvans, bacterial infections, dissecting cellulitis, tinea capitis)
    •  
      White follicular spicules (monoclonal gammopathy)
  •  
    Surface structure
    •  
      Starburst pattern hyperplasia (folliculitis decalvans)
Classification of perifollicular and interfollicular skin surface abnormalities in trichoscopy (most common or characteristic occurrences shown in parentheses)
Data from Rudnicka L, Olszewska M, Rakowska A, editors. Trichoscopy: dermoscopy of hair and scalp. Springer-Verlag; 2012.

Evaluation of Blood Vessels

Appearance of cutaneous microvessels in trichoscopy may vary in type, arrangement, and number, depending on disease. Analysis of blood vessel arrangement is of special importance in differential diagnosis of inflammatory scalp diseases, such as scalp psoriasis, seborrheic dermatitis, or discoid lupus erythematosus. 

Differential diagnosis of nonscarring alopecia

Telogen Effluvium

The term, telogen effluvium , refers to a wide range of clinical situations with the common feature of abrupt, generalized shedding of telogen hairs. It is considered the most common type of hair loss, but only limited evidence-based knowledge is available.
Trichoscopy findings in telogen effluvium include presence of empty hair follicles, predominance of follicular units with only 1 hair, perifollicular discoloration (peripilar sign), and upright regrowing hairs ( Fig. 1 Table 1 ). Trichoscopy results do not differ depending on the factor that induced telogen hair loss. 
Fig. 1
Telogen effluvium. Clinical appearance ( ) and trichoscopy ( ). Trichoscopy shows multiple upright regrowing hairs ( blue arrows ) and predominance of follicular units with only 1 hair ( white arrows ). There is no hair shaft thickness heterogeneity, which allows excluding androgenetic alopecia.
Table 1
Trichoscopy features of telogen effluvium and androgenetic alopecia
Telogen EffluviumAndrogenetic Alopecia
Follicular units with only 1 hair+++
Upright regrowing hairs++±
Perifollicular discoloration (peripilar sign)+++
Vellus hairs+
Hair shaft thickness heterogeneity+
Predominance of abnormalities in the frontal region+
+, Increased; ++, significantly increased.
Adapted from Rudnicka L, Olszewska M, Rakowska A, editors. Trichoscopy: dermoscopy of hair and scalp. Springer-Verlag; 2012.

Androgenetic Alopecia

Male androgenetic alopecia and female androgenetic alopecia share similar trichoscopy features. Hair shaft thickness heterogeneity, with simultaneous presence of thin, intermediate, and thick hairs, is the most characteristic feature of androgenetic alopecia. It has been shown that hair diameter diversity reflects follicle miniaturization in androgenetic alopecia.  Hair thickness may be estimated when performing trichoscopy with a handheld dermoscope. With this method, hair shafts may classified as thin, intermediate, or thick. Some digital videodermoscopes possess software that allows detailed evaluation of hair shaft thickness in micrometers. Detailed evaluation of hair shaft thickness is not necessary for diagnosis and differential diagnosis in clinical practice but may be useful for monitoring treatment efficacy  and is indispensable for clinical trials.
Another trichoscopy feature of androgenetic alopecia is increased proportion of vellus hairs. The proportion of vellus hairs in the frontal scalp area of patients with female androgenetic alopecia is 20.9% ± 12%.  This is significantly more than the 6.15% ± 4.6% in healthy volunteers.  Multiple vellus hairs may be also present in severe alopecia areata.  Thus, sole presence of vellus hairs should not be mistaken for androgenetic alopecia.
The number of hairs in 1 follicular unit is decreased in androgenetic alopecia. Follicular units with only 1 hair predominate in these patients, especially in a late phase of disease. In the frontal area of patients with female androgenetic alopecia, average percentage of follicular units with only 1 hair is 65.2% ± 19.9%. The corresponding number in healthy individuals is 27.3% ± 13%.  The percentage of follicular units with only 1 hair is also increased in telogen effluvium (39.0% ± 13.4%) and in various forms of anagen hair loss. 
The authors' experience and study results of show presence of yellow dots a constant finding in androgenetic alopecia, but literature data are inconsistent.
In different studies, yellow dots were observed in 66%,  30.5%,  10% to 26%,  and 7%  of patients with androgenetic alopecia. The authors find an explanation for this discrepancy in that in androgenetic alopecia some yellow dots have only sebaceous content and not keratosebaceous material, as in other diseases. These sebaceous yellow dots may be washed away by a vigorous hair wash. Accordingly, when patients come for a trichoscopy examination directly after washing their hair, these yellow dots may not be detectable. In the authors' practice, in patients with noncicatricial alopecia, trichoscopy is always performed together with a trichogram. For this reason, patients are asked to not wash their hair for 3 days before examination. The small, sebaceous yellow dots may develop during these 3 days. This hypothesis is partly confirmed by the authors' unpublished observations, showing that the number of sebaceous yellow dots in androgenetic alopecia is higher before than after hair washing. No other trichoscopy features depend on hair washing.
Brown perifollicular discoloration (peripilar sign)  is observed in 20% to 66% of patients with androgenetic alopecia.  A proportion of 32.4% ± 4.7% hair follicle openings are affected.  This feature may be also observed in some patients with telogen effluvium and in healthy individuals with the difference that in androgenetic alopecia the proportion of affected hair follicle openings is higher in the frontal compared with the occipital area. In healthy individuals and in patients with telogen effluvium, the proportion of affected hair follicle openings is significantly lower and the distribution is proportional in all scalp areas.  Table 1summarizes the major differences between androgenetic alopecia and telogen effluvium. Fig. 2 presents major trichoscopy features of androgenetic alopecia. 
Fig. 2
Female androgenetic alopecia. Clinical appearance ( ) and trichoscopy ( ). Trichoscopy shows significant hair shaft thickness heterogeneity, yellow dots ( blue arrows ), and predominance of follicular units with only 1 hair ( white arrows ).
Trichoscopy of senescent (senile, involutionary) alopecia shares with androgenetic alopecia predominance of follicular units with only 1 hair, decreased hair shaft density with honeycomb pattern pigmentation, and slight tendency to form brown perifollicular discoloration (peripilar sign). 

Alopecia Areata

In most cases, alopecia areata is diagnosed based on clinical appearance.  Trichoscopy may be useful, however, for differential diagnosis of difficult cases, in particular in diffuse alopecia areata or in patients with total hair loss.
The hallmark trichoscopy features of alopecia areata are regularly distributed yellow dots, micro–exclamation mark hairs, tapered hairs, black dots, broken hairs, and regrowing hairs. Trichoscopy of alopecia areata may differ depending on diseases activity, severity, and duration. These differences were evaluated in multiple studies in recent years.
Lacarrubba and colleagues  investigated 200 patients with alopecia areata, subdivided into acute and chronic disease. This study identified 3 features of acute alopecia areata: micro–exclamation marks, black dots, and vellus hairs. Inui and colleagues  identified similar markers of disease activity (black dots, tapering hairs, and broken hairs) based on trichoscopy performed in 300 patients with alopecia areata. In this study, vellus hairs were found to be a marker of long-lasting, inactive disease. Ross and colleagues  divided 58 patients with alopecia areata into the following subgroups: patchy, ophiasis, diffuse, and alopecia totalis/universalis. Trichoscopy features were similarly expressed in all investigated subgroups. The authors' experience  shows that black dots are a most constant marker of disease activity in alopecia areata. A recent study from Turkey performed with a handheld dermoscope confirmed earlier data obtained by digital videodermoscopy.
Some patients with active alopecia areata of long duration show monilethrix-like hairs with characteristic Pohl-Pinkus constrictions. In a study by Mane and colleagues,  this type of abnormality was observed in 2 of 66 (3%) investigated patients with alopecia areata. Presence of hairs with Pohl-Pinkus constrictions may lead to misdiagnosis of monilethrix.
Features of hair regrowth include pigmented short upright regrowing hairs  and regularly coiled pigtail hairs. The authors used the term, pigtail hairs , in a publication  to describe hairs that form regular circular or oval structures as they grow. They have to be distinguished from irregularly coiled hairs of trichotillomania.
Trichotillomania is a common and the most difficult differential diagnosis of alopecia areata.  Trichoscopy features of alopecia areata are presented in Fig. 3 
Fig. 3
Female androgenetic alopecia. Clinical appearance ( ) and trichoscopy ( B, C ). Trichoscopy of active alopecia areata ( ) shows micro–exclamation mark hairs ( blue arrow ), black dots ( white arrow ), and tapered hairs ( green arrow ), which differ from micro–exclamation mark hairs in that their distal end is not visible within 1 field on view of a dermoscope. In long-lasting inactive alopecia areata ( ), regularly distributed yellow dots ( blue arrows ) and vellus hairs ( white arrows ) predominate in trichoscopy.

Trichotillomania

Trichoscopy of trichotillomania shows decreased hair density, hairs broken at different lengths, short hairs with trichoptilosis (split ends), irregular coiled hairs, upright regrowing hairs, and black dots.  Yellow dots are generally not observed in trichotillomania.  Inui and colleagues  observed yellow dots in 1 patient with trichotillomania. These dots differed from yellow dots in other diseases by containing a black dot in their central part.  The authors' retrospective analysis of trichoscopy images confirms the presence of characteristic yellow dots with fine black peppering inside as a rare but highly characteristic trichoscopy feature of trichotillomania.  This finding has to be differentiated from yellow dots in dissecting folliculitis, which are bigger, bulging, and contain a single black hair shaft residue.
In a recent study,  the authors identified further characteristic trichoscopy features of trichotillomania. These are hair shaft residues, which appear in trichoscopy as flame hairs, tulip hairs, V-sign, and structureless hair residues ( Table 2 ). 
Table 2
Trichoscopy differential diagnosis of trichotillomania
TrichotillomaniaAlopecia Areata
Broken hairs+++
Irregular coiled hairs/hook hairs+
Short hairs with trichoptilosis (split ends)+
Micro–exclamation mark hairs+++
Tapered hairs+++
Flame hairs+
Tulip hairs+++
V-sign++±
Structureless hair residues+±
Black dots+++
Yellow dots±++
Yellow dots with black peppering+
Regrowing pigtail hairs (circular or oval)+
Hypopigmented vellus hairs+
Adapted from Rudnicka L, Olszewska M, Rakowska A, editors. Trichoscopy: dermoscopy of hair and scalp. Springer-Verlag; 2012.
Micro–exclamation mark hairs are rare in trichotillomania,  but they may be a diagnostic pitfall and cause misdiagnosis of alopecia areata. The authors' experience shows that micro–exclamation mark hairs in trichotillomania tend to have a pigmented proximal end and a flat distal end, whereas most micro–exclamation mark hairs in alopecia areata have a hypopigmented proximal end and a pointed distal end. 
Alopecia areata may be the initial trigger for trichotillomania and the 2 conditions may coexist,  which makes trichoscopic differential diagnosis even more challenging. Table 2 summarizes main differences in trichoscopy between trichotillomania and alopecia areata. Trichoscopy features of trichotillomania are presented in Fig. 4 
Fig. 4
Trichotillomania. Clinical appearance ( ) and trichoscopy ( ). Trichoscopy shows multiple faces of hair residues. These include broken hairs ( blue arrow ), micro–exclamation mark hairs ( white arrow ), black dots ( black arrow ), and hook hairs (green arrow ), which reflect incomplete coiling of mechanically stretched hairs.

Differential diagnosis of cicatricial alopecia

Cicatricial alopecia is less frequent in clinical practice compared with noncicatricial alopecia and differential diagnosis is rarely difficult.  Trichoscopy may be helpful, however, in establishing correct diagnosis in doubtful cases. The most characteristic trichoscopy features of cicatricial alopecia are presented in Table 3 . The table includes the most common types of primary cicatricial alopecia: discoid lupus erythematosus, classic lichen planopilaris, frontal fibrosing alopecia, dissecting cellulitis, and folliculitis decalvans. 
Table 3
Trichoscopy features of cicatricial alopecia
Discoid Lupus ErythematosusClassic Lichen PlanopilarisFrontal Fibrosing AlopeciaDissecting CellulitisFolliculitis Decalvans
VesselsThick arborizing vessels+++
Elongated vessels+++
Pinpoint-like vessels with whitish halo+++
ColorWhite and milky-red homogenous areas+++++++
Dark-brown scattered discoloration+
Violaceous blue discoloration+++
Structure-less yellow areas+
Dots3-D yellow dots (soap bubbles) with hairs residues+
Large yellow dots+
White dots+++++
Red dots+++
Gray dots (eyebrows)+
ScalingPerifollicular scaling++++
HyperplasiaPerifollicular hyperplasia with starburst pattern+
++, Very common; +, common.
Adapted from Rakowska A, Slowinska M, Kowalska-Oledzka E, et al. Trichoscopy in cicatricial alopecia. J Drugs Dermatol 2012;11(6):753–8.

Discoid Lupus Erythematosus

The most characteristic trichoscopy features of discoid lupus erythematosus of the scalp are thick arborizing vessels and large yellow dots.  Scattered brown discoloration of the skin may be observed in some patients. Yellow dots with radial, thin arborizing vessels emerging from the dot are considered characteristic for discoid lupus erythematosus. This feature is sometimes referred to as “red spider in yellow dot.”  Red dots, described by Tosti and colleagues,  are considered a good prognostic factor for of hair regrowth. Long-lasting, inactive lesions differ from active lesions by presence of structureless milky-red areas, and lack of follicular openings ( Fig. 5 ). 
Fig. 5
Discoid lupus erythematosus. Clinical appearance ( ) and trichoscopy ( ). Trichoscopy shows multiple thick arborizing vessels ( blue arrow ), large yellow dots ( white arrow ), and fine scaling in the central part of the image.

Classic Lichen Planopilaris

The most characteristic trichoscopy feature of classic lichen planopilaris is white perifollicular scaling with scales entangling hair shafts up to 2 mm to 3 mm above scalp surface. The authors call this phenomenon, tubular scaling 
Other findings include perifollicular inflammation, elongated blood vessels, and violaceous blue interfollicular areas. 
In the fibrotic stage of lichen planopilaris, the predominating features are big, irregular (classic) white dots, which merge into white and/or milky-red areas.  The color and appearance of the milky-red areas, which correspond to fibrosis of recent onset, are described by some investigators as strawberry ice cream color ( Fig. 6 ). 
Fig. 6
Classic lichen planopilaris. Clinical appearance ( ) and trichoscopy ( ). Trichoscopy shows milky-red (strawberry ice cream color) area with a decreased number of follicular openings. Perifollicular scaling is visible ( blue arrow ). Scales may form tubular structures, which entangle the emerging hair shaft ( white arrow ). This feature is called tubular scaling.

Frontal Fibrosing Alopecia

Trichoscopy findings in active frontal fibrosing alopecia include minor perifollicular scaling and predominance of follicular openings with only 1 hair ( Fig. 7 ). Arborizing vessels were described in 1 study  but not confirmed by other investigators.  
Fig. 7
Frontal fibrosing alopecia. Clinical appearance ( ) and trichoscopy ( ). Trichoscopy shows an ivory-white area with a significantly decreased number of follicular openings. Mild perifollicular scaling ( blue arrow ) and a solitary (lonely) hair is visible.

Dissecting Cellulitis

In dissecting cellulitis (dissecting folliculitis, perifolliculitis capitis abscedens et suffodiens) trichoscopy shows yellow, structureless areas. A characteristic finding is yellow dots with 3-D structure imposed over a thick, black, hair shaft residue. The authors consider the term, soap bubbles , used by Dr Sami Abdennader during a conference lecture, adequate to describe this feature ( Fig. 8 ). Pinpoint-like vessels with a whitish halo were described in patients with dissecting folliculitis,  but they are not uncommon in other scalp diseases.  End-stage disease with scarring lesions is characterized by confluent ivory-white areas lacking follicular openings. 
Fig. 8
Frontal fibrosing alopecia. Clinical appearance ( ) and trichoscopy ( ). Trichoscopy shows yellow structure-less areas and multiple 3-D yellow dots superimposed over black hair residues (soap bubbles) ( arrows ).

Folliculitis Decalvans

Folliculitis decalvans is characterized by presence of multiple hairs in 1 follicular unit.  These follicular tufts usually consist of 5 to 20 hairs.  This feature may be observed both clinically and by trichoscopy ( Fig. 9 ). Additional trichoscopy findings include perifollicular hyperplasia arranged in a starburst pattern and follicular pustules.  Tubular scaling is observed in 66% of patients with folliculitis decalvans.  It differs from tubular scaling in patients with lichen planopilaris by a yellowish color and by a tendency to fold away from the hair shafts and form collar-like structures.  
Fig. 9
Folliculitis decalvans. Clinical appearance ( ) and trichoscopy ( ). Trichoscopy shows tufts of hairs emerging from follicular units.
In long-lasting lesions, white or milky-red (strawberry ice cream color) areas lacking follicular openings predominate.  White dots are rare.  There seems to be no characteristic vascular pattern, although Baroni and Romano  observed increased numbers of twisted red loops.

Pseudopelade Brocq

Trichoscopy features of classic pseudopelade of Brocq are nonspecific. These are white areas with no follicular openings. Solitary dystrophic hairs at the periphery of the lesion may be found. Thus, Brocq pseudopelade is a diagnosis of exclusion both clinically and by trichoscopy. 

Differential diagnosis of hair shaft abnormalities

Trichoscopy is a perfect tool for noninvasive evaluation of most genetic hair shaft abnormalities.  It has been documented that trichoscopy allows detecting characteristic structure abnormalities of monilethrix ( Fig. 10),  trichorrhexis invaginata,  trichorrhexis nodosa,  pili torti,  and pili annulati. The first studies were performed with a digital videodermoscopy system, but Silverberg and colleagues showed that trichoscopy with a handheld dermoscope also may be applied as an in-office technique to diagnose genetic diseases of the hair. 
Fig. 10
Monilethrix. Clinical appearance ( ) and trichoscopy ( ). Trichoscopy shows monilethrix hairs ( arrows ) with constrictions at regular intervals. Hairs bend and fracture in constricted areas.

Other applications of trichoscopy

Kim and colleagues  performed a large study that documented that trichoscopy may be used for differential diagnosis of inflammatory scalp diseases, such as scalp psoriasis and seborrheic dermatitis, based predominantly on structure and arrangement of blood vessels.
Slowinska and colleagues  described comma hairs as a characteristic feature of tinea capitis ( Fig. 11 ). Later, Hughes and colleagues  identified corckscrew hairs as another characteristic finding in patches of tinea capitis. Recent findings show also zigzag hairs and interrupted (Morse code–like) hairs are observed in these patients.  
Fig. 11
Tinea capitis caused by Microsporum canis . Clinical appearance ( ) and trichoscopy ( B, C ). Trichoscopy shows multiple comma hairs ( arrows ). Initial formation of corkscrew hairs, which represent comma hairs with multiple twists, is visible ( ). Hairs with transverse bands (Morse code hairs) are presented ( ).
Courtesy of Dr Monika Slowinska.)
Accumulating casuistic data indicate that trichoscopy may develop into a method of diagnosis beyond dermatology. Possible application of trichoscopy in identifying follicular spicules in multiple myeloma, follicular mucinosis in lymphoproliferative disorders,  or scalp lesions in Langerhans cell histiocytosis  is feasible, but requires adequate, evidence-based confirmation.

UV-enhanced trichoscopy

UV-enhanced trichoscopy is a method of hair and scalp evaluation, first described by the authors' group in 2011. This method differs from classic trichoscopy by replacing regular or polarized light with UV light, at a wavelength covering the spectrum of a Wood lamp. This method may enhance the diagnostic potential of trichoscopy in tinea capitis and Malassezia furfur (Pityrosporum ovale) infections ( Fig. 12 ). 
Fig. 12
UV-enhanced trichoscopy (UVET) differs from classic trichoscopy by application of UV light, at a wavelength covering the spectrum of a Wood lamp. The method may enhance the diagnostic potential of trichoscopy in tinea capitis and Malassezia furfur (Pityrosporum ovale) infections and may serve as aid in monitoring treatment efficacy in these infections. This image shows orange fluorescence in patients with pityrosporum folliculitis.
Authors have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1In Rudnicka L., Olszewska M., and Rakowska A. (eds): Trichoscopy: dermoscopy of hair and scalp. Springer-Verlag: London, 2012.
    View In Article
  2. 2Rudnicka L., Olszewska M., Rakowska A., et al: Trichoscopy update 2011. J Dermatol Case Rep 2011; 5: pp. 82-88
    View In Article
  3. 3Vogt A., McElwee K.J., and Blume-Peytavi U.: Biology of the hair follicle. In Blume-Peytavi U., Tosti A., and Whiting D. (eds): Hair; from basic science to clinical application. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2008. pp. 1-22
    View In Article Cross Ref
  4. 4Rakowska A.: Trichoscopy (hair and scalp videodermoscopy) in the healthy female. Method standardization and norms for measurable parameters. J Dermatol Case Rep 2009; 3: pp. 14-19
    View In Article
  5. 5Inui S., Nakajima T., and Itami S.: Scalp dermoscopy of androgenetic alopecia in Asian people. J Dermatol 2009; 36: pp. 82-85
    View In Article Cross Ref
  6. 6Van Neste D.: Natural scalp hair regression in preclinical stages of male androgenetic alopecia and its reversal by finasteride. Skin Pharmacol Physiol 2006; 19: pp. 168-176
    View In Article Cross Ref
  7. 7Slowinska M., Rudnicka L., Schwartz R.A., et al: Comma hairs: a dermatoscopic marker for tinea capitis: a rapid diagnostic method. J Am Acad Dermatol 2008; 59: pp. S77-S79
    View In Article Cross Ref
  8. 8Sandoval A.B., Ortiz J.A., Rodriguez J.M., et al: Rev Iberoam Micol 2010; 27: pp. 151-152
    View In Article Cross Ref
  9. 9Hughes R., Chiaverini C., Bahadoran P., et al: Corkscrew hair: a new dermoscopic sign for diagnosis of tinea capitis in black children. Arch Dermatol 2011; 147: pp. 355-356
    View In Article Cross Ref
  10. 10Ross E.K., Vincenzi C., and Tosti A.: Videodermoscopy in the evaluation of hair and scalp disorders. J Am Acad Dermatol 2006; 55: pp. 799-806
    View In Article Cross Ref
  11. 11Inui S., Nakajima T., Nakagawa K., et al: Clinical significance of dermoscopy in alopecia areata: analysis of 300 cases. Int J Dermatol 2008; 47: pp. 688-693
    View In Article Cross Ref
  12. 12Rudnicka L., Olszewska M., Rakowska A., et al: Trichoscopy: a new method for diagnosing hair loss. J Drugs Dermatol 2008; 7: pp. 651-654
    View In Article
  13. 13Inui S.: Trichoscopy for common hair loss diseases: algorithmic method for diagnosis. J Dermatol 2011; 38: pp. 71-75
    View In Article Cross Ref
  14. 14Lacarrubba F., Dall'Oglio F., Rita Nasca M., et al: Videodermatoscopy enhances diagnostic capability in some forms of hair loss. Am J Clin Dermatol 2004; 5: pp. 205-208
    View In Article Cross Ref
  15. 15Rakowska A., Slowinska M., Kowalska-Oledzka E., et al: Dermoscopy in female androgenic alopecia: method standardization and diagnostic criteria. Int J Trichology 2009; 1: pp. 123-130
    View In Article Cross Ref
  16. 16Rakowska A., Slowinska M., Kowalska-Oledzka E., et al: Trichoscopy of cicatricial alopecia. J Drugs Dermatol 2012; 11: pp. 753-758
    View In Article
  17. 17de Moura L.H., Duque-Estrada B., Abraham L.S., et al: Dermoscopy findings of alopecia areata in an African-American patient. J Dermatol Case Rep 2008; 2: pp. 52-54
    View In Article
  18. 18Abraham L.S., Pineiro-Maceira J., Duque-Estrada B., et al: Pinpoint white dots in the scalp: dermoscopic and histopathologic correlation. J Am Acad Dermatol 2010; 63: pp. 721-722
    View In Article Cross Ref
  19. 19Tosti A., Torres F., Misciali C., et al: Follicular red dots: a novel dermoscopic pattern observed in scalp discoid lupus erythematosus. Arch Dermatol 2009; 145: pp. 1406-1409
    View In Article
  20. 20de Lacharriere O., Deloche C., Misciali C., et al: Hair diameter diversity: a clinical sign reflecting the follicle miniaturization. Arch Dermatol 2001; 137: pp. 641-646
    View In Article
  21. 21Olszewska M., and Rudnicka L.: Effective treatment of female androgenic alopecia with dutasteride. J Drugs Dermatol 2005; 4: pp. 637-640
    View In Article
  22. 22Slowinska M. [The value of videodermoscopy in differential diagnosis of androgenetic alopecia. Doctoral thesis]. Medical University of Warsaw; 2010.
    View In Article
  23. 23Karadag Kose O., and Gulec A.T.: Clinical evaluation of alopecias using a handheld dermatoscope. J Am Acad Dermatol 2012; 67: pp. 206-214
    View In Article Cross Ref
  24. 24Deloche C., de Lacharriere O., Misciali C., et al: Histological features of peripilar signs associated with androgenetic alopecia. Arch Dermatol Res 2004; 295: pp. 422-428
    View In Article Cross Ref
  25. 25Shapiro J.: Dermatologic therapy: alopecia areata update. Dermatol Ther 2011; 24: pp. 301
    View In Article Cross Ref
  26. 26Alkhalifah A., Alsantali A., Wang E., et al: Alopecia areata update: part I. Clinical picture, histopathology, and pathogenesis. J Am Acad Dermatol 2010; 62: pp. 177-188
    View In Article Cross Ref
  27. 27Rakowska A, Olszewska M, Rudnicka L. Differential diagnosis of alopecia areata versus trichotilomania by trichoscopy. J Dermatol Case Rep, in press.
    View In Article
  28. 28Mane M., Nath A.K., and Thappa D.M.: Utility of dermoscopy in alopecia areata. Indian J Dermatol 2011; 56: pp. 407-411
    View In Article Cross Ref
  29. 29Abraham L.S., Torres F.N., and Azulay-Abulafia L.: Dermoscopic clues to distinguish trichotillomania from patchy alopecia areata. An Bras Dermatol 2010; 85: pp. 723-726
    View In Article Cross Ref
  30. 30Gallouj S., Rabhi S., Baybay H., et al: Ann Dermatol Venereol 2011; 138: pp. 140-141
    View In Article Cross Ref
  31. 31Lee D.Y., Lee J.H., Yang J.M., et al: The use of dermoscopy for the diagnosis of trichotillomania. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2009; 23: pp. 731-732
    View In Article
  32. 32Ihm C.W., and Han J.H.: Diagnostic value of exclamation mark hairs. Dermatology 1993; 186: pp. 99-102
    View In Article Cross Ref
  33. 33Sah D.E., Koo J., and Price V.H.: Trichotillomania. Dermatol Ther 2008; 21: pp. 13-21
    View In Article Cross Ref
  34. 34Otberg N., Wu W.Y., McElwee K.J., et al: Diagnosis and management of primary cicatricial alopecia: part I. Skinmed 2008; 7: pp. 19-26
    View In Article Cross Ref
  35. 35Wu W.Y., Otberg N., McElwee K.J., et al: Diagnosis and management of primary cicatricial alopecia: part II. Skinmed 2008; 7: pp. 78-83
    View In Article Cross Ref
  36. 36Olsen E., Stenn K., Bergfeld W., et al: Update on cicatricial alopecia. J Investig Dermatol Symp Proc 2003; 8: pp. 18-19
    View In Article Cross Ref
  37. 37Duque-Estrada B., Tamler C., Sodre C.T., et al: Dermoscopy patterns of cicatricial alopecia resulting from discoid lupus erythematosus and lichen planopilaris. An Bras Dermatol 2010; 85: pp. 179-183
    View In Article Cross Ref
  38. 38Assouly P., and Reygagne P.: Lichen planopilaris: update on diagnosis and treatment. Semin Cutan Med Surg 2009; 28: pp. 3-10
    View In Article Cross Ref
  39. 39Kossard S., and Zagarella S.: Spotted cicatricial alopecia in dark skin. A dermoscopic clue to fibrous tracts. Australas J Dermatol 1993; 34: pp. 49-51
    View In Article Cross Ref
  40. 40Inui S., Nakajima T., Shono F., et al: Dermoscopic findings in frontal fibrosing alopecia: report of four cases. Int J Dermatol 2008; 47: pp. 796-799
    View In Article Cross Ref
  41. 41Rubegni P., Mandato F., and Fimiani M.: Frontal fibrosing alopecia: role of dermoscopy in differential diagnosis. Case Rep Dermatol 2010; 2: pp. 40-45
    View In Article Cross Ref
  42. 42Otberg N., Kang H., Alzolibani A.A., et al: Folliculitis decalvans. Dermatol Ther 2008; 21: pp. 238-244
    View In Article Cross Ref
  43. 43Trueb R.M.: Systematic approach to hair loss in women. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges 2010; 8: pp. 284-297
    View In Article Cross Ref
  44. 44Baroni A., and Romano F.: Tufted hair folliculitis in a patient affected by pachydermoperiostosis: case report and videodermoscopic features. Skinmed 2011; 9: pp. 186-188
    View In Article
  45. 45Alzolibani A.A., Kang H., Otberg N., et al: Pseudopelade of Brocq. Dermatol Ther 2008; 21: pp. 257-263
    View In Article Cross Ref
  46. 46Olszewska M., Rudnicka L., Rakowska A., et al: Trichoscopy. Arch Dermatol 2008; 144: pp. 1007
    View In Article
  47. 47Mirmirani P., Huang K.P., and Price V.H.: A practical, algorithmic approach to diagnosing hair shaft disorders. Int J Dermatol 2011; 50: pp. 1-12
    View In Article Cross Ref
  48. 48Rakowska A., Slowinska M., Czuwara J., et al: Dermoscopy as a tool for rapid diagnosis of monilethrix. J Drugs Dermatol 2007; 6: pp. 222-224
    View In Article
  49. 49Liu C.I., and Hsu C.H.: Rapid diagnosis of monilethrix using dermoscopy. Br J Dermatol 2008; 159: pp. 741-743
    View In Article
  50. 50Jain N., and Khopkar U.: Monilethrix in pattern distribution in siblings: diagnosis by trichoscopy. Int J Trichology 2010; 2: pp. 56-59
    View In Article
  51. 51Rakowska A., Slowinska M., Kowalska-Oledzka E., et al: Trichoscopy in genetic hair shaft abnormalities. J Dermatol Case Rep 2008; 2: pp. 14-20
    View In Article
  52. 52Wallace M.P., and de Berker D.A.: Hair diagnoses and signs: the use of dermatoscopy. Clin Exp Dermatol 2010; 35: pp. 41-46
    View In Article Cross Ref
  53. 53Rakowska A., Kowalska-Oledzka E., Slowinska M., et al: Hair shaft videodermoscopy in netherton syndrome. Pediatr Dermatol 2009; 26: pp. 320-322
    View In Article Cross Ref
  54. 54Burk C., Hu S., Lee C., et al: Netherton syndrome and trichorrhexis invaginata—a novel diagnostic approach. Pediatr Dermatol 2008; 25: pp. 287-288
    View In Article Cross Ref
  55. 55Silverberg N.B., Silverberg J.I., and Wong M.L.: Trichoscopy using a handheld dermoscope: an in-office technique to diagnose genetic disease of the hair. Arch Dermatol 2009; 145: pp. 600-601
    View In Article
  56. 56Kim G.W., Jung H.J., Ko H.C., et al: Dermoscopy can be useful in differentiating scalp psoriasis from seborrhoeic dermatitis. Br J Dermatol 2011; 164: pp. 652-656
    View In Article
  57. 57Tay L.K., Lim F.L., Ng H.J., et al: Cutaneous follicular hyperkeratotic spicules–the first clinical sign of multiple myeloma progression or relapse. Int J Dermatol 2010; 49: pp. 934-936
    View In Article Cross Ref
  58. 58LeBoit P.E.: Alopecia mucinosa, inflammatory disease or mycosis fungoides: must we choose? And are there other choices? Am J Dermatopathol 2004; 26: pp. 167-170
    View In Article Cross Ref

No comments: